olov
2006-04-18, 08:53
I'm trying to modelize a climber, falling from 5 meters on a crash pad, using Abaqus. A crash pad is used for outdoor climbing and typically consists of:
a 3cm top layer of polyethylene
a 7cm bottom layer of polyurethane
It is used as crash protecetion in climbing up to 5 meters. Thus far we have a dynamic hyperfoam 3D-model consisting of the two layers (1mx1mx0.09m) with a 0.3mx0.3mx0.3m cube (almost solid to modelize the feet) falling on it.
Unfortunately, our currrent results are not very satisfying. With a speed of impact of only 2m/s the climber (cube) bottoms out, which is not at all realistic. We fear that this might be because of the uniaxal test data we've put into Abaqus. We only have access to testing equipment with a maximal compression rate of 100mm/min (compared to 10*1000*60mm/min at impact when fallling from 5 meters ). Is there any reason to continue our model or can compression test data with higher strain rates be found elsewhere? Could the problem be something else?
I would be very grateful if someone could give me some comments about this.
Thank you in advance,
Olov Isaksson
a 3cm top layer of polyethylene
a 7cm bottom layer of polyurethane
It is used as crash protecetion in climbing up to 5 meters. Thus far we have a dynamic hyperfoam 3D-model consisting of the two layers (1mx1mx0.09m) with a 0.3mx0.3mx0.3m cube (almost solid to modelize the feet) falling on it.
Unfortunately, our currrent results are not very satisfying. With a speed of impact of only 2m/s the climber (cube) bottoms out, which is not at all realistic. We fear that this might be because of the uniaxal test data we've put into Abaqus. We only have access to testing equipment with a maximal compression rate of 100mm/min (compared to 10*1000*60mm/min at impact when fallling from 5 meters ). Is there any reason to continue our model or can compression test data with higher strain rates be found elsewhere? Could the problem be something else?
I would be very grateful if someone could give me some comments about this.
Thank you in advance,
Olov Isaksson